Stacker Studio

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in South Carolina

Written by:
January 23, 2024
Canva

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in South Carolina

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in South Carolina children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

1 / 46
Bennekom // Shutterstock

#46. Allendale County

- Economic connectedness: 0.36
- Median Income: $31,800
- Population: 8,304
--- 22.9% white
--- 73.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
2 / 46
Wilma Engelhardt Ellis // Shutterstock

#45. Marlboro County

- Economic connectedness: 0.38
- Median Income: $32,136
- Population: 26,912
--- 40% white
--- 50.1% Black
--- 3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
3 / 46
Kristi Blokhin // Shutterstock

#44. Dillon County

- Economic connectedness: 0.41
- Median Income: $39,780
- Population: 28,527
--- 46.4% white
--- 47.4% Black
--- 2.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
4 / 46
Canva

#43. Saluda County

- Economic connectedness: 0.41
- Median Income: $46,451
- Population: 19,008
--- 62.2% white
--- 24.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
5 / 46
Brian Nolan // Shutterstock

#42. Marion County

- Economic connectedness: 0.43
- Median Income: $34,465
- Population: 29,585
--- 38.7% white
--- 56.9% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
6 / 46
Canva

#41. Lee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.43
- Median Income: $36,195
- Population: 16,730
--- 33.7% white
--- 63% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
7 / 46
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#40. Williamsburg County

- Economic connectedness: 0.45
- Median Income: $40,124
- Population: 31,279
--- 32.1% white
--- 64.4% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
8 / 46
Canva

#39. Union County

- Economic connectedness: 0.47
- Median Income: $40,048
- Population: 27,306
--- 64.9% white
--- 30% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
9 / 46
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#38. Bamberg County

- Economic connectedness: 0.47
- Median Income: $44,408
- Population: 13,525
--- 37.2% white
--- 60.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
10 / 46
Canva

#37. Cherokee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.47
- Median Income: $41,330
- Population: 56,204
--- 73.5% white
--- 19.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
11 / 46
James R Poston // Shutterstock

#36. Orangeburg County

- Economic connectedness: 0.47
- Median Income: $38,052
- Population: 84,909
--- 35% white
--- 61.8% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
12 / 46
C Dash // Shutterstock

#35. Barnwell County

- Economic connectedness: 0.49
- Median Income: $38,237
- Population: 20,801
--- 51.4% white
--- 46.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
13 / 46
Jen Wolf // Shutterstock

#34. Hampton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.5
- Median Income: $38,298
- Population: 19,227
--- 41.2% white
--- 52.8% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
14 / 46
Canva

#33. Colleton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.5
- Median Income: $41,419
- Population: 38,520
--- 56.7% white
--- 35.9% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
15 / 46
Jared Freye // Shutterstock

#32. Darlington County

- Economic connectedness: 0.5
- Median Income: $40,704
- Population: 63,433
--- 55.7% white
--- 41.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
16 / 46
Canva

#31. Fairfield County

- Economic connectedness: 0.51
- Median Income: $41,755
- Population: 21,186
--- 39.3% white
--- 57.3% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
17 / 46
Chansak Joe // Shutterstock

#30. Chesterfield County

- Economic connectedness: 0.51
- Median Income: $45,046
- Population: 43,655
--- 62.6% white
--- 31.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
18 / 46
Canva

#29. Chester County

- Economic connectedness: 0.51
- Median Income: $46,441
- Population: 32,273
--- 59.7% white
--- 37% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
19 / 46
Canva

#28. Laurens County

- Economic connectedness: 0.52
- Median Income: $46,754
- Population: 67,148
--- 69.3% white
--- 22.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
20 / 46
Canva

#27. Jasper County

- Economic connectedness: 0.52
- Median Income: $47,811
- Population: 28,363
--- 49.4% white
--- 39% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
21 / 46
Canva

#26. Greenwood County

- Economic connectedness: 0.52
- Median Income: $44,513
- Population: 69,338
--- 62.7% white
--- 32% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
22 / 46
Canva

#25. Clarendon County

- Economic connectedness: 0.52
- Median Income: $45,542
- Population: 31,613
--- 48.9% white
--- 46.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
23 / 46
Canva

#24. Florence County

- Economic connectedness: 0.53
- Median Income: $51,902
- Population: 137,276
--- 51.6% white
--- 43% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
24 / 46
Canva

#23. Georgetown County

- Economic connectedness: 0.54
- Median Income: $55,719
- Population: 62,992
--- 65.2% white
--- 30.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
25 / 46
Canva

#22. Newberry County

- Economic connectedness: 0.54
- Median Income: $50,950
- Population: 37,842
--- 61.9% white
--- 30.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
26 / 46
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#21. Calhoun County

- Economic connectedness: 0.55
- Median Income: $52,491
- Population: 14,198
--- 56.1% white
--- 39.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
27 / 46
Canva

#20. Sumter County

- Economic connectedness: 0.55
- Median Income: $49,040
- Population: 105,537
--- 45.8% white
--- 46.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
28 / 46
Canva

#19. McCormick County

- Economic connectedness: 0.56
- Median Income: $53,193
- Population: 9,584
--- 52.2% white
--- 44.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
29 / 46
Canva

#18. Abbeville County

- Economic connectedness: 0.58
- Median Income: $45,710
- Population: 24,374
--- 69.7% white
--- 26.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
30 / 46
Canva

#17. Lancaster County

- Economic connectedness: 0.62
- Median Income: $67,407
- Population: 94,653
--- 73% white
--- 20.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
31 / 46
Canva

#16. Richland County

- Economic connectedness: 0.63
- Median Income: $56,137
- Population: 414,719
--- 43.1% white
--- 47.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.9% Asian
32 / 46
Canva

#15. Spartanburg County

- Economic connectedness: 0.63
- Median Income: $57,627
- Population: 322,864
--- 70.5% white
--- 20.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.2% Asian
33 / 46
Canva

#14. Aiken County

- Economic connectedness: 0.64
- Median Income: $57,572
- Population: 168,045
--- 68.4% white
--- 24.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
34 / 46
Canva

#13. Anderson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.64
- Median Income: $56,796
- Population: 202,223
--- 78.4% white
--- 15.4% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
35 / 46
Bennekom // Shutterstock

#12. Edgefield County

- Economic connectedness: 0.65
- Median Income: $55,183
- Population: 25,938
--- 60% white
--- 34.2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
36 / 46
Canva

#11. Oconee County

- Economic connectedness: 0.65
- Median Income: $52,842
- Population: 77,932
--- 85.8% white
--- 7.1% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
37 / 46
Canva

#10. Kershaw County

- Economic connectedness: 0.67
- Median Income: $56,449
- Population: 64,989
--- 69.5% white
--- 23.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
38 / 46
Canva

#9. Greenville County

- Economic connectedness: 0.71
- Median Income: $65,513
- Population: 519,178
--- 70.7% white
--- 17.2% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.5% Asian
39 / 46
Canva

#8. Dorchester County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $68,046
- Population: 160,180
--- 65.4% white
--- 24.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
40 / 46
Canva

#7. Lexington County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $65,623
- Population: 291,723
--- 76.1% white
--- 14.9% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
41 / 46
Canva

#6. Beaufort County

- Economic connectedness: 0.73
- Median Income: $74,199
- Population: 186,007
--- 72% white
--- 16.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
42 / 46
Canva

#5. Horry County

- Economic connectedness: 0.73
- Median Income: $54,688
- Population: 344,865
--- 80% white
--- 12.7% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
43 / 46
Canva

#4. Berkeley County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $70,786
- Population: 224,806
--- 65.1% white
--- 23.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
44 / 46
Canva

#3. Pickens County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $53,188
- Population: 129,617
--- 87% white
--- 6.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.8% Asian
45 / 46
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock

#2. York County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76
- Median Income: $72,234
- Population: 276,569
--- 72.3% white
--- 18.9% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.6% Asian
46 / 46
Canva

#1. Charleston County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79
- Median Income: $70,807
- Population: 404,946
--- 67.4% white
--- 25.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

Trending Now