
The 74 / GovSpend
1 / 2Cell phones: distractions or essential life lines?
Most districts already prohibit students from using phones in class for non-academic reasons. But phone-free advocates say tighter restrictions are necessary to refocus students on learning following the pandemic and to minimize the negative impact of social media on students' mental health.
Such moves typically draw strong reactions. Some parents see phones as integral to staying in touch with their children during emergencies.
But many welcome the opportunity to curb frequent disruption. Teens report being on social media "almost constantly," according to new data from the Pew Research Center. Efforts to break their habit, at least during school hours, could get a critical boost if Congress passes a bill that would create a $5 million grant program to cover the costs of "secure containers" like Yondr or wall-mounted phone lockers.
"Widespread use of cellphones in schools are at best a distraction for young Americans; at worst, they expose schoolchildren to content that is harmful and addictive," Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, a Republican, said in a statement about his bipartisan proposal with Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat. "Our legislation will make schools remain centers of learning."
Congress would still need to approve funding for the program. The legislation also directs the Education and Health and Human Services departments to study the impact of cellphone bans on student achievement, mental health and behavior.
A 'security nightmare'
Getting student violence and bullying under control is one reason the Akron school board approved its $180,000 agreement with Yondr in June for 10,446 pouches. Leaders hope locking up phones during the day will halt a troubling pattern of students not only using them to arrange fights on social media, but record the altercations on video.
"It was happening daily in our buildings and multiple times a day," Shipe said. As in many districts, physical attacks against teachers had also increased. "It was just a real security nightmare."
Many students have rebelled against the changes. And Shipe warned that opposition to losing what she described as "an appendage" for most teens "gets worse before it gets better." Online discussion threads among students include ways to destroy the pouches, and demonstrations on TikTok show how bending the magnetic closure prevents them from locking.
But as Shipe notes, those who sabotage the pouches typically keep their phones hidden during class, if only to avoid getting suspended.
"There are just a lot of positives," she said.
Are phone bans sending a 'mixed message'?
Many researchers and advocates agree that school phone bans have more benefits than drawbacks. In October, nearly 70 child advocates, educators and mental health experts sent Education Secretary Miguel Cardona a letter asking him to urge schools to adopt phone-free policies. Late last month, an author of the letter met with a senior department official, but didn't get the response she wanted.
"The secretary does not intend to act on our phone-free schools letter," said Lisa Cline, part of the Screen Time Action Network, a coalition focused on limiting children's use of digital devices.
Cardona has yet to reveal his opinion on banning phones, but he's frequently mentioned the role social media plays in the mental health problems facing students. In March 2023, Cardona said media companies should be held accountable for "the experiment they are running on our children." Two months later, the White House announced that the department would work with other agencies to issue model policies for districts on phone use.
An Education Department spokesman said officials are still preparing that guidance and are working "in close partnership" with Surgeon General Vivek Murthy on the issue.
Under the Senate bill, districts would need to get feedback from parents on cellphone restrictions before applying for funding, and the bill directs Cardona to choose grantees that will "likely yield helpful information" on the impact of phone bans. The program also would allow exceptions for students with disabilities and those who need phones for translation apps or to treat health conditions.
While Yondr's growth is one piece of evidence on the trend, a 2022 survey pointed to the popularity of phone bans among parents. In a sample of nearly 11,000 parents with a child in school, 61% agreed with getting phones out of the classroom. The National Parents Union is currently collecting more data on the issue, but the stance of its president, Keri Rodrigues, is firm.
"The data is clear," she said. "[Phones] should absolutely be banned during the school day. Every parent I talk to has agreed."
International research points to higher test scores when phones are out of sight, and some educators say students tune in to class more when they're not scrolling on social media. In Massachusetts, where Rodrigues lives, the state education department already awards grants for districts that clamp down on use, and Commissioner Jeffrey Riley has hinted at expanding the program.
But some parents aren't on board.
"Parents are afraid because of school shootings," said Melissa Erickson, executive director of Alliance for Public Schools, a Florida nonprofit that aims to inform parents about education policy. "That's a statement of the times."
She called those in favor of strict bans "tone deaf" to the way students socialize. Kids depended on devices to stay connected to friends and teachers during the pandemic. Banning them, she said, sends a mixed message.
"We told them that one-to-one is everything and now we're taking it away," she said.









