In response to these dismal statistics, some school districts are focusing more on conflict resolution, in-person interventions, and other methods of correction than suspensions.
An EdWeek Research Center survey found that almost half of educators reported that their districts or schools use restorative justice more than they did five years ago: 35% said that their schools use expulsions less and 44% said that their schools use out-of-school suspensions less.
The numbers are optimistic, but as Allison Payne, chair of the Department of Sociology and Criminology at Villanova University points out, the purest form of restorative justice is hard to come by. "It requires a complete overhaul of not just the disciplinary structure but the full ethos of a school," she told EdWeek. Many schools often use restorative justice practices alongside punitive consequences causing confusion among students. Nevertheless, it is a start.
Last year, Nebraska passed a law banning suspensions for pre-kindergarten to second grade.
The only exception is if a student brings a deadly weapon to school. The ban has had mixed results. Some teachers complained that they were not given alternative discipline guidance. For example, when a student in Omaha slapped an instructional aide in the face, they returned to the classroom hours later. Now, a state legislative bill allowing schools to suspend young students who turn violent and harm people is pending.
Portland Public Schools altered its suspension policy, agreeing to use therapists, psychologists, and school counselors to help students thrive.
Oakland Unified School District uses restorative justice for discipline using "circle-of-trust" interventions that bring all parties together to resolve conflicts. In addition, in 2020, the school board voted to eliminate police presence from Oakland schools, diverting its $6 million policing budget for new safety protocols and programs to curb the school-to-prison mentality.
In 2023, California banned middle and high school students from being suspended for "willful defiance," a subjective low-level infraction. Willful defiance could mean refusing to remove a hat or drumming on a desk.
According to data from the California Department of Education, by the end of the 2021-22 school year, Black students accounted for 14% of willful defiance suspensions despite only comprising 5% of the statewide student population. Latino students were also overrepresented. Specifically, although 1 in 3 school boys were Latino, close to half accounted for willful defiance suspensions.
Under the ban, teachers can remove students from a class for unruly behavior but are not allowed to request a suspension. Instead, the school administrator must figure out the best support or in-school intervention for the student.
In response to implicit bias, Jason Okonofu, psychologist and professor at the University of California-Berkeley, developed a three-part empathetic discipline technique that involves viewing misbehavior not as an indictment of character but as an opportunity for learning and growth, often recognizing misbehavior as a cry for help. The intervention also calls on teachers to build stronger bonds with their students and encourages them to get a better perspective by asking what their students are experiencing rather than making suppositions. Research on this intervention shows a reduction of racial disparities in suspension by as much as 50%.
Whatever the form of alternative discipline, schools will treat future generations less like criminals and more like complex human beings. Certainly, Horace Mann would be pleased.
Story editing by Carren Jao. Additional editing by Kelly Glass. Copy editing by Sofia Jarrin.