
National Student Support Accelerator, Stanford University
1 / 2As districts continue to look for ways to boost reading scores and curb pandemic losses, findings strengthen the case for incorporating tutoring into the regular school day
The model demonstrates that even brief contact with a trained tutor who focuses on specific phonics skills can help struggling readers reach grade-level goals. The findings, based on data from over 800 students in 13 Broward schools, build on promising results from the 2021-22 school year.
About half the students, then in kindergarten, were randomly assigned to receive tutoring while the rest got business-as-usual instruction.
In the 2022-23 school year, first graders who continued in the program were more likely than their peers to develop basic reading skills, such as accurately decoding short consonant-vowel-consonant words and those with a silent 'e' on the end. The researchers will continue to follow the students through third grade.
The program is considered a "push-in" model because the tutors, called early literacy interventionists, meet with students during the school day, generally at a table in the back of the classroom. Using a tablet computer, they lead students through short, scripted lessons where students need help — on specific letter sounds, blends or sight words, for example — and calculate the number of correct words read per minute.
Children making adequate progress might only see their tutor a couple times a week, while those who are far behind receive daily sessions. Later in the day, students spend another 15-20 minutes practicing with the same Chapter One software.
"It kind of runs itself," said Ingrid Rosales, a literacy coach at Orange Brook Elementary, a Title I school in Hollywood, Florida. "It doesn't really interfere with our instruction."
Convincing school districts
That's one key to the success of Chapter One — now serving over 20,000 students in 21 districts across 14 states, said founder Seth Weinberger. Tutors run their sessions while the teacher is either leading the whole class in a lesson or as students work in small groups. Over the course of the day, a tutor might meet with at least 25 students across multiple classrooms.
"More important than the affordability is how nondisruptive our program is," Weinberger said. "That made it much easier for us to convince school districts to allow us to do high-impact tutoring during the school day."
Even effective high-dosage programs often run a full 30 minutes a few times a week, making them harder to schedule. And research shows that when programs operate after school, participation lags due to a lack of transportation and scheduling conflicts.
"Once you move the sessions to after school, you really lose the consistency of it," Weinberger said.
Weinberger founded the Chicago-based program 30 years ago and developed the software to give students practice on basic reading skills. But the pandemic fueled greater demand. The nonprofit, which also works with schools in Canada and the United Kingdom, had 100 employees two years ago and now has 500.
The original version relied on teachers to blend the mini lessons into their instruction, an approach that wasn't always successful. Shortly before the pandemic, Weinberger's team substantially changed the model by having former teachers lead the sessions.
"It was incredibly successful," he said. But they also found that it could take two years of "intensive work" to help a student from a low-income family become a strong reader. "We said, 'There's no substitute for this, but we're going to have to create our own corps of tutors.'"









