David Garrison // Shutterstock
1 / 50#50. Franklin County
- Total high-hazard dams: 11
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (18.2%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
Risky reservoirs: North Carolina counties where aging dams pose the greatest threat
Record rainfall pelted parts of Iowa for 12 hours straight in July 2010, sending 10 inches of rainwater draining toward Lake Delhi, Iowa, a popular recreation destination for decades since its construction in the 1920s.
Holding back 9 miles of lake water with more precipitation flowing in by the minute was the 80-year-old Lake Delhi Dam, constructed of hundreds of feet of earth, concrete, and steel. The water punched a 30-foot-wide hole in the dam wall, spewing floodwater into the surrounding region.
Emergency and state officials ordered evacuations in time to prevent any loss of life. For safety professionals, the failure underscored the threat posed to dams by climate change (increasing the risk of flooding events), the importance of regular maintenance and inspection, and the impact of human errors in dam construction on dam integrity.
In North Carolina, there are a total of 1,533 high-hazard dams. Up to 24.3% of them could pose a threat to residents, including those that were assessed to be an immediate threat or in poor condition, those that were not rated, and those which had ratings withheld.
As part of a national analysis, GetMyBoat identified counties in North Carolina with the most dams at risk of failure that pose the greatest potential threat to nearby residents, using data from the Army Corps of Engineers' National Inventory of Dams, pulled in October 2023. The public database allowing Americans to look up the conditions of nearby dams has grown to include more than 90,000 dams.
As more dams get added to the national inventory, analyses of this database reveal a growing number of dams in poor and unsatisfactory condition, some of which have the potential to be life-threatening should they fail—dams the inventory deems "high-hazard."
Counties in this analysis are ranked by the share of high-hazard dams that could pose a danger to human life, including those assessed to be in "poor" or "unsatisfactory" condition, those that haven't received inspections, and those where the state agency that oversees them has not rated its conditions. Ties were broken by the overall number of dams meeting those criteria, and then by their concentration among local populations, though some ties may remain.
A designation of "poor" is given to inspected dams showing deficiencies that threaten the dam's integrity during normal operations. "Unsatisfactory" is given to dams that require "immediate or emergency remedial action," according to the Army Corps of Engineers. About 1 in 10 of the inventory's dam listings have no condition reported by state agencies.
"It is likely most of these dams should be listed at not rated, but we will work with the appropriate agencies to verify the information and update the NID accordingly," Army Corps of Engineers spokesperson Gene Pawlik said in a statement.
The names of dams accompanying each state in the analysis represent the largest dams by height that were in poor or unsatisfactory condition. The total number and concentration of high-hazard dams give a sense of the stakes involved with aging infrastructure in each state, though those figures don't factor into the ranking.
The Lake Delhi Dam was reconstructed and was last inspected in 2020, receiving a "satisfactory" grade. The dam is considered one risk level below high-hazard, "significant hazard." But its failure in 2010 provides an example of the high stakes communities living near large dams face when they fail.
Illinois ranks high on this list, mainly because of what is unknown about the conditions of its dams. The Army Corps of Engineers leaves it up to state agencies to decide what information it provides or withholds from the public database. Illinois only shares info on three of its dams deemed to be high-hazard. One of its engineers has previously said that it doesn't rate dams' conditions because the process is too resource-intensive to justify.
Many state and federal agencies have chosen to keep data about those dams hidden, citing threats to national security. North Dakota and Oregon withhold data about around 40% of the dams in their states, making it difficult for locals to assess just how many are in good condition or need attention.
Other states rank poorly for their share of high-hazard dams that have gone without inspection. In Missouri, about 42% of these dams don't have a recorded date of last inspection. Another 24% were last inspected prior to 2000.
Read on to see how dams in your area fare based on publicly available data.
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock
2 / 50#49. Alexander County
- Total high-hazard dams: 11
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (18.2%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock
3 / 50#48. Rowan County
- Total high-hazard dams: 21
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (19.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Canva
4 / 50#47. Wake County
- Total high-hazard dams: 186
- Number potentially dangerous: 36 (19.4%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 16 in poor condition
--- 19 not rated
--- 1 condition withheld
refrina // Shutterstock
5 / 50#46. Northampton County
- Total high-hazard dams: 5
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (20.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 not rated
CJ Nunnery // Shutterstock
6 / 50#45. Lee County
- Total high-hazard dams: 10
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (20.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
Canva
7 / 50#44. Guilford County
- Total high-hazard dams: 80
- Number potentially dangerous: 16 (20.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 8 in poor condition
--- 7 not rated
--- 1 condition withheld
Canva
8 / 50#43. Haywood County
- Total high-hazard dams: 17
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (23.5%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
tjewell041810 // Shutterstock
9 / 50#42. Lenoir County
- Total high-hazard dams: 4
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (25.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 not rated
David Byron Keener // Shutterstock
10 / 50#41. Beaufort County
- Total high-hazard dams: 4
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (25.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 not rated
Canva
11 / 50#40. Alleghany County
- Total high-hazard dams: 4
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (25.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
Canva
12 / 50#39. Davidson County
- Total high-hazard dams: 16
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (25.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 2 in poor condition
KAD Photo // Shutterstock
13 / 50#38. Chatham County
- Total high-hazard dams: 23
- Number potentially dangerous: 6 (26.1%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 5 condition withheld
KAD Photo // Shutterstock
14 / 50#37. Moore County
- Total high-hazard dams: 55
- Number potentially dangerous: 15 (27.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 10 in poor condition
--- 5 not rated
Isaiah N Lilly // Shutterstock
15 / 50#36. Stanly County
- Total high-hazard dams: 18
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (27.8%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
--- 4 not rated
David Louis Econopouly // Shutterstock
16 / 50#35. Alamance County
- Total high-hazard dams: 14
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (28.6%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 4 not rated
Giulia Carletti // Shutterstock
17 / 50#34. Wayne County
- Total high-hazard dams: 17
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (29.4%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 2 not rated
Darwin Brandis // Shutterstock
18 / 50#33. Richmond County
- Total high-hazard dams: 10
- Number potentially dangerous: 3 (30.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 2 not rated
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock
19 / 50#32. Rutherford County
- Total high-hazard dams: 19
- Number potentially dangerous: 6 (31.6%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
--- 5 in poor condition
Nikola Spasic Photography // Shutterstock
20 / 50#31. Pitt County
- Total high-hazard dams: 3
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (33.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
Canva
21 / 50#30. Robeson County
- Total high-hazard dams: 3
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (33.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 not rated
Mary Terriberry // Shutterstock
22 / 50#29. Wilkes County
- Total high-hazard dams: 6
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (33.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 1 condition withheld
Nagel Photography // Shutterstock
23 / 50#28. Buncombe County
- Total high-hazard dams: 57
- Number potentially dangerous: 19 (33.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
--- 17 not rated
Canva
24 / 50#27. Anson County
- Total high-hazard dams: 11
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (36.4%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 1 condition withheld
JNix // Shutterstock
25 / 50#26. Macon County
- Total high-hazard dams: 32
- Number potentially dangerous: 12 (37.5%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 4 posing immediate threat
--- 4 in poor condition
--- 4 not rated
Canva
26 / 50#25. Jackson County
- Total high-hazard dams: 37
- Number potentially dangerous: 14 (37.8%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 7 in poor condition
--- 5 not rated
Canva
27 / 50#24. Avery County
- Total high-hazard dams: 21
- Number potentially dangerous: 8 (38.1%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 8 not rated
Canva
28 / 50#23. Cabarrus County
- Total high-hazard dams: 31
- Number potentially dangerous: 12 (38.7%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 11 not rated
Canva
29 / 50#22. Watauga County
- Total high-hazard dams: 18
- Number potentially dangerous: 7 (38.9%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
--- 3 condition withheld
Kirkam // Shutterstock
30 / 50#21. Caswell County
- Total high-hazard dams: 5
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (40.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
Toribio93 // Shutterstock
31 / 50#20. Madison County
- Total high-hazard dams: 10
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (40.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Canva
32 / 50#19. Polk County
- Total high-hazard dams: 10
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (40.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 4 in poor condition
Canva
33 / 50#18. Transylvania County
- Total high-hazard dams: 46
- Number potentially dangerous: 19 (41.3%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 7 posing immediate threat
--- 9 in poor condition
--- 3 not rated
Canva
34 / 50#17. Yancey County
- Total high-hazard dams: 7
- Number potentially dangerous: 3 (42.9%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Canva
35 / 50#16. Cumberland County
- Total high-hazard dams: 46
- Number potentially dangerous: 20 (43.5%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 5 posing immediate threat
--- 4 in poor condition
--- 11 not rated
Canva
36 / 50#15. Burke County
- Total high-hazard dams: 11
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (45.5%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Wileydoc // Shutterstock
37 / 50#14. Harnett County
- Total high-hazard dams: 28
- Number potentially dangerous: 13 (46.4%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 6 in poor condition
--- 5 not rated
iofoto // Shutterstock
38 / 50#13. Brunswick County
- Total high-hazard dams: 4
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (50.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 not rated
digidreamgrafix // Shutterstock
39 / 50#12. Graham County
- Total high-hazard dams: 6
- Number potentially dangerous: 3 (50.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
--- 1 condition withheld
Canva
40 / 50#11. Duplin County
- Total high-hazard dams: 9
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (55.6%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 2 not rated
Canva
41 / 50#10. Swain County
- Total high-hazard dams: 9
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (55.6%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 5 in poor condition
Noemia Poole // Shutterstock
42 / 50#9. Montgomery County
- Total high-hazard dams: 3
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (66.7%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 in poor condition
Ruth McNeill Photography // Shutterstock
43 / 50#8. Scotland County
- Total high-hazard dams: 6
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (66.7%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 3 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Canva
44 / 50#7. Hoke County
- Total high-hazard dams: 9
- Number potentially dangerous: 6 (66.7%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 5 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock
45 / 50#6. Caldwell County
- Total high-hazard dams: 17
- Number potentially dangerous: 12 (70.6%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 4 posing immediate threat
--- 4 in poor condition
--- 4 not rated
Canva
46 / 50#5. Sampson County
- Total high-hazard dams: 7
- Number potentially dangerous: 5 (71.4%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 2 posing immediate threat
--- 3 not rated
James R Poston // Shutterstock
47 / 50#4. Cherokee County
- Total high-hazard dams: 11
- Number potentially dangerous: 8 (72.7%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
--- 5 in poor condition
--- 2 condition withheld
George Dukin // Shutterstock
48 / 50#3. Clay County
- Total high-hazard dams: 5
- Number potentially dangerous: 4 (80.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 4 condition withheld
Canva
49 / 50#2. Pamlico County
- Total high-hazard dams: 1
- Number potentially dangerous: 1 (100.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 posing immediate threat
Chansak Joe // Shutterstock
50 / 50#1. Bladen County
- Total high-hazard dams: 2
- Number potentially dangerous: 2 (100.0%)
- Potentially dangerous dams include:
--- 1 in poor condition
--- 1 not rated
This story features data reporting by Paxtyn Merten, writing by Dom DiFurio, and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.
