Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Texas
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Texas
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Texas children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Midland County
- Median Income: $88,210
- Population: 166,964
--- 73.3% white
--- 6.4% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
#49. Andrews County
- Median Income: $80,518
- Population: 18,184
--- 74.5% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#48. Montague County
- Median Income: $59,127
- Population: 19,850
--- 92.4% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#47. Wilson County
- Median Income: $84,042
- Population: 49,374
--- 82.8% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#46. Presidio County
- Median Income: $26,395
- Population: 6,328
--- 69.6% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#45. Gillespie County
- Median Income: $64,438
- Population: 26,730
--- 88% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#44. Lynn County
- Median Income: $49,747
- Population: 5,587
--- 76.3% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#43. Mills County
- Median Income: $53,483
- Population: 4,520
--- 84.6% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#42. Hays County
- Median Income: $71,061
- Population: 234,573
--- 76.6% white
--- 4% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#41. Lampasas County
- Median Income: $66,506
- Population: 21,443
--- 82.2% white
--- 3.7% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#40. Randall County
- Median Income: $70,544
- Population: 139,176
--- 83.7% white
--- 3.3% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
#39. Guadalupe County
- Median Income: $80,047
- Population: 169,477
--- 69.4% white
--- 8.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#38. Hemphill County
- Median Income: $54,867
- Population: 3,450
--- 77.8% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#37. Hamilton County
- Median Income: $44,030
- Population: 8,211
--- 91.9% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#36. Callahan County
- Median Income: $55,820
- Population: 13,781
--- 92% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#35. Chambers County
- Median Income: $93,707
- Population: 45,257
--- 79.2% white
--- 7.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#34. Fort Bend County
- Median Income: $102,590
- Population: 806,497
--- 44.8% white
--- 20.2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 21% Asian
#33. Fayette County
- Median Income: $66,624
- Population: 24,445
--- 86.8% white
--- 6.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#32. Van Zandt County
- Median Income: $61,121
- Population: 58,782
--- 91.6% white
--- 2.9% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#31. Erath County
- Median Income: $56,691
- Population: 42,288
--- 86% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#30. Fisher County
- Median Income: $55,862
- Population: 3,720
--- 83.4% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#29. Johnson County
- Median Income: $70,767
- Population: 177,022
--- 85.6% white
--- 4.4% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#28. Martin County
- Median Income: $69,194
- Population: 5,213
--- 83.5% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#27. Archer County
- Median Income: $67,083
- Population: 8,616
--- 92.9% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#26. Real County
- Median Income: $44,083
- Population: 2,852
--- 95.8% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#25. Shackelford County
- Median Income: $54,896
- Population: 3,145
--- 93.2% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#24. Mason County
- Median Income: $73,186
- Population: 3,948
--- 85.9% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#23. Upton County
- Median Income: $58,333
- Population: 3,340
--- 42.7% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#22. Goliad County
- Median Income: $52,335
- Population: 7,085
--- 83.2% white
--- 4.9% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#21. Hood County
- Median Income: $75,851
- Population: 60,521
--- 91.9% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#20. Clay County
- Median Income: $69,967
- Population: 10,236
--- 92.8% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#19. Wise County
- Median Income: $75,482
- Population: 67,877
--- 88.3% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#18. Hardin County
- Median Income: $65,347
- Population: 56,124
--- 88.8% white
--- 6.1% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#17. Donley County
- Median Income: $52,888
- Population: 3,266
--- 87.6% white
--- 6.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#16. Bandera County
- Median Income: $64,495
- Population: 20,839
--- 85.4% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#15. Rockwall County
- Median Income: $111,595
- Population: 105,227
--- 77.4% white
--- 7.2% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.1% Asian
#14. Somervell County
- Median Income: $89,253
- Population: 9,170
--- 82.4% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#13. Sterling County
- Median Income: $55,481
- Population: 1,391
--- 76.9% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#12. Coke County
- Median Income: $42,639
- Population: 3,288
--- 87.8% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#11. Parker County
- Median Income: $88,535
- Population: 144,803
--- 89.4% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#10. Blanco County
- Median Income: $71,201
- Population: 11,313
--- 81.1% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#9. Brewster County
- Median Income: $48,679
- Population: 9,501
--- 80.7% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.9% Asian
#8. Denton County
- Median Income: $96,265
- Population: 885,012
--- 68.2% white
--- 10.3% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 9.5% Asian
#7. Comal County
- Median Income: $85,912
- Population: 156,257
--- 84.1% white
--- 2.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#6. Williamson County
- Median Income: $94,705
- Population: 591,759
--- 71.9% white
--- 6.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 7.5% Asian
#5. Kendall County
- Median Income: $100,706
- Population: 43,842
--- 82.9% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#4. Carson County
- Median Income: $76,786
- Population: 5,856
--- 91.8% white
--- 1% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#3. Collin County
- Median Income: $104,327
- Population: 1,039,812
--- 62.9% white
--- 10.1% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 16.3% Asian
#2. Armstrong County
- Median Income: $71,136
- Population: 1,980
--- 93.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#1. Oldham County
- Median Income: $68,077
- Population: 2,251
--- 88% white
--- 4.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.