Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Alabama
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Alabama
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Alabama children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Sumter County
- Median Income: $27,099
- Population: 12,482
--- 25.7% white
--- 71.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#49. Randolph County
- Median Income: $47,081
- Population: 21,984
--- 77.1% white
--- 18.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#48. Marshall County
- Median Income: $52,938
- Population: 97,179
--- 88.8% white
--- 2.9% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#47. Clarke County
- Median Income: $44,108
- Population: 23,346
--- 52% white
--- 45.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#46. Russell County
- Median Income: $44,065
- Population: 58,695
--- 47.2% white
--- 44.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#45. Mobile County
- Median Income: $51,169
- Population: 414,620
--- 57.4% white
--- 36.1% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
#44. Franklin County
- Median Income: $43,633
- Population: 32,034
--- 78.1% white
--- 4.4% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#43. Marengo County
- Median Income: $35,379
- Population: 19,397
--- 45.4% white
--- 51.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#42. Houston County
- Median Income: $50,222
- Population: 106,355
--- 67.4% white
--- 27.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#41. Clay County
- Median Income: $45,163
- Population: 14,184
--- 82.1% white
--- 13.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#40. Jackson County
- Median Income: $43,785
- Population: 52,548
--- 90.4% white
--- 3.5% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#39. Geneva County
- Median Income: $43,581
- Population: 26,604
--- 84.2% white
--- 9.6% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#38. Hale County
- Median Income: $32,294
- Population: 14,819
--- 38.3% white
--- 59% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#37. DeKalb County
- Median Income: $44,037
- Population: 71,554
--- 83.7% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#36. Etowah County
- Median Income: $46,984
- Population: 103,468
--- 78.3% white
--- 15.6% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#35. Pike County
- Median Income: $40,106
- Population: 33,176
--- 57.2% white
--- 36.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
#34. Jefferson County
- Median Income: $58,330
- Population: 672,550
--- 50.9% white
--- 42.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#33. Winston County
- Median Income: $46,096
- Population: 23,650
--- 94.1% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#32. Calhoun County
- Median Income: $50,977
- Population: 116,425
--- 72.8% white
--- 21.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#31. Covington County
- Median Income: $46,186
- Population: 37,490
--- 84.1% white
--- 12.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#30. Henry County
- Median Income: $55,870
- Population: 17,165
--- 70% white
--- 26.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#29. Cherokee County
- Median Income: $43,475
- Population: 24,975
--- 91.5% white
--- 4.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#28. Crenshaw County
- Median Income: $43,103
- Population: 13,300
--- 70.6% white
--- 24.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#27. Morgan County
- Median Income: $56,128
- Population: 122,608
--- 77.6% white
--- 13.1% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#26. Pickens County
- Median Income: $43,389
- Population: 19,240
--- 57.2% white
--- 40.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#25. Bibb County
- Median Income: $54,277
- Population: 22,412
--- 75.9% white
--- 22.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#24. Chilton County
- Median Income: $56,243
- Population: 44,857
--- 81.1% white
--- 8.8% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#23. Lawrence County
- Median Income: $51,712
- Population: 33,089
--- 77.1% white
--- 10.4% Black
--- 5.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#22. Dale County
- Median Income: $50,052
- Population: 49,443
--- 70.8% white
--- 20.7% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#21. Walker County
- Median Income: $47,442
- Population: 65,194
--- 88.6% white
--- 5.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#20. Marion County
- Median Income: $44,551
- Population: 29,392
--- 91.6% white
--- 4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#19. Colbert County
- Median Income: $52,017
- Population: 56,789
--- 78.2% white
--- 16.4% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#18. Tuscaloosa County
- Median Income: $57,508
- Population: 223,945
--- 62.5% white
--- 32.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#17. Cullman County
- Median Income: $52,690
- Population: 87,129
--- 92.8% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#16. Choctaw County
- Median Income: $38,581
- Population: 12,792
--- 56.7% white
--- 41.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#15. Coffee County
- Median Income: $59,034
- Population: 53,043
--- 73.8% white
--- 17% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#14. Fayette County
- Median Income: $43,960
- Population: 16,365
--- 84.2% white
--- 12.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#13. Cleburne County
- Median Income: $48,333
- Population: 15,046
--- 93.1% white
--- 2.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#12. Elmore County
- Median Income: $67,597
- Population: 87,146
--- 74.7% white
--- 20.8% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#11. Lauderdale County
- Median Income: $50,000
- Population: 93,342
--- 85% white
--- 10% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#10. Limestone County
- Median Income: $70,736
- Population: 101,217
--- 77.4% white
--- 13.1% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.8% Asian
#9. Washington County
- Median Income: $44,512
- Population: 15,574
--- 65.8% white
--- 23.8% Black
--- 7.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#8. Lamar County
- Median Income: $43,324
- Population: 13,929
--- 86.9% white
--- 11.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#7. Autauga County
- Median Income: $62,660
- Population: 58,239
--- 75.1% white
--- 19.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#6. Blount County
- Median Income: $52,830
- Population: 58,884
--- 92.5% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#5. Lee County
- Median Income: $57,191
- Population: 172,223
--- 69.3% white
--- 22.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 4.4% Asian
#4. Baldwin County
- Median Income: $64,346
- Population: 227,131
--- 84.5% white
--- 8.8% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#3. Madison County
- Median Income: $71,153
- Population: 382,149
--- 66.7% white
--- 24.3% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.6% Asian
#2. St. Clair County
- Median Income: $65,070
- Population: 90,412
--- 86.2% white
--- 9.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#1. Shelby County
- Median Income: $82,592
- Population: 220,780
--- 78.7% white
--- 12.6% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.9% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.