Best- and worst-run cities in California

Written by:
March 28, 2024
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

Best- and worst-run cities in California

Historically high inflation has put a strain on municipal budgets, with the rising costs of labor, goods and services, and materials. In general, local governments made it through the COVID-19 pandemic relatively well, with the help of billions of dollars in federal aid.

The economic aftermath, however, continues. And some cities continue to struggle more than others, particularly those that are poorly managed.

Stacker examined WalletHub's 149 Best- and Worst-Run Cities in America to find the most efficient cities in California. Cities are ranked by their overall operating efficiency, which is determined by the quality of services and total budget per capita. The data was last updated in June 2023.

Factors used to determine the overall quality of city services rank and score comprise weighted average scores in six key categories, including financial stability, education, health, safety, economy, and infrastructure and pollution. Scores for each of the six categories were evaluated based on 36 relevant metrics such as average life expectancy, violent crime rate, quality of roads, and Moody's city credit rating.

Read on to see the best- and worst-run cities in California.

1 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#16. San Francisco

- WalletHub rank: #149 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 12
- Financial stability rank: 49
- Education rank: 12
- Health rank: 2
- Safety rank: 65
- Economy rank: 92
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 16

2 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#15. Oakland

- WalletHub rank: #143 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 76
- Financial stability rank: 65
- Education rank: 60
- Health rank: 6
- Safety rank: 126
- Economy rank: 131
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 97

3 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#14. Riverside

- WalletHub rank: #133 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 87
- Financial stability rank: 126
- Education rank: 57
- Health rank: 47
- Safety rank: 55
- Economy rank: 16
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 145

4 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#13. Long Beach

- WalletHub rank: #129 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 75
- Financial stability rank: 130
- Education rank: 32
- Health rank: 16
- Safety rank: 48
- Economy rank: 122
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 120

5 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#12. Los Angeles

- WalletHub rank: #128 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 59
- Financial stability rank: 96
- Education rank: 85
- Health rank: 21
- Safety rank: 53
- Economy rank: 119
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 87

6 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#11. Stockton

- WalletHub rank: #121 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 139
- Financial stability rank: 140
- Education rank: 120
- Health rank: 88
- Safety rank: 115
- Economy rank: 107
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 147

7 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#10. Sacramento

- WalletHub rank: #120 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 92
- Financial stability rank: 117
- Education rank: 76
- Health rank: 55
- Safety rank: 79
- Economy rank: 97
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 103

8 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#9. Fresno

- WalletHub rank: #118 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 113
- Financial stability rank: 113
- Education rank: 70
- Health rank: 81
- Safety rank: 86
- Economy rank: 99
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 137

9 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#8. Modesto

- WalletHub rank: #116 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 103
- Financial stability rank: 121
- Education rank: 107
- Health rank: 95
- Safety rank: 63
- Economy rank: 74
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 100

10 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#7. Bakersfield

- WalletHub rank: #110 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 122
- Financial stability rank: 109
- Education rank: 80
- Health rank: 105
- Safety rank: 81
- Economy rank: 96
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 149

11 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#6. San Jose

- WalletHub rank: #104 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 17
- Financial stability rank: 57
- Education rank: 23
- Health rank: 1
- Safety rank: 40
- Economy rank: 61
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 121

12 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#5. Anaheim

- WalletHub rank: #99 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 68
- Financial stability rank: 139
- Education rank: 44
- Health rank: 8
- Safety rank: 38
- Economy rank: 57
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 124

13 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#4. Fremont

- WalletHub rank: #78 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 2
- Financial stability rank: 122
- Education rank: 1
- Health rank: 9
- Safety rank: 27
- Economy rank: 19
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 104

14 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#3. Santa Ana

- WalletHub rank: #71 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 48
- Financial stability rank: 88
- Education rank: 82
- Health rank: 10
- Safety rank: 39
- Economy rank: 53
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 129

15 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#2. San Diego

- WalletHub rank: #56 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 7
- Financial stability rank: 86
- Education rank: 8
- Health rank: 7
- Safety rank: 25
- Economy rank: 39
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 41

16 / 16
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

#1. Huntington Beach

- WalletHub rank: #21 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 1
- Financial stability rank: 62
- Education rank: 2
- Health rank: 11
- Safety rank: 15
- Economy rank: 26
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 66

This story features data reporting and writing by Elena Cox and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 19 states.

Trending Now