Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Kansas
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Kansas
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Kansas children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Franklin County
- Median Income: $63,996
- Population: 25,953
--- 92.2% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#49. Dickinson County
- Median Income: $59,400
- Population: 18,572
--- 92.7% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#48. Doniphan County
- Median Income: $54,792
- Population: 7,549
--- 91.6% white
--- 5.1% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#47. Leavenworth County
- Median Income: $80,853
- Population: 81,601
--- 81.3% white
--- 8.1% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#46. Clay County
- Median Income: $52,716
- Population: 8,085
--- 95.9% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#45. Lincoln County
- Median Income: $48,457
- Population: 2,952
--- 95.5% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#44. Osborne County
- Median Income: $55,551
- Population: 3,512
--- 94.8% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#43. Kingman County
- Median Income: $54,852
- Population: 7,495
--- 95.3% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#42. Chase County
- Median Income: $49,453
- Population: 2,583
--- 93.4% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#41. Butler County
- Median Income: $71,651
- Population: 67,404
--- 90% white
--- 2.3% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#40. Rawlins County
- Median Income: $58,590
- Population: 2,531
--- 93.5% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#39. Cheyenne County
- Median Income: $45,039
- Population: 2,647
--- 91.9% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#38. Ness County
- Median Income: $63,241
- Population: 2,717
--- 86.5% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#37. Jackson County
- Median Income: $62,023
- Population: 13,287
--- 85.5% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 7.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#36. Logan County
- Median Income: $62,202
- Population: 2,777
--- 93.6% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#35. Thomas County
- Median Income: $69,844
- Population: 7,902
--- 92.7% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#34. Marshall County
- Median Income: $58,750
- Population: 9,995
--- 95.4% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#33. Barber County
- Median Income: $52,984
- Population: 4,178
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#32. Osage County
- Median Income: $61,702
- Population: 15,811
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#31. Ottawa County
- Median Income: $57,455
- Population: 5,778
--- 95.1% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#30. Marion County
- Median Income: $54,679
- Population: 11,877
--- 94.5% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#29. Republic County
- Median Income: $50,268
- Population: 4,707
--- 96.5% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#28. Coffey County
- Median Income: $63,167
- Population: 8,361
--- 95.3% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#27. Graham County
- Median Income: $44,091
- Population: 2,444
--- 90.5% white
--- 4.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#26. Morris County
- Median Income: $50,242
- Population: 5,377
--- 95.6% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#25. Phillips County
- Median Income: $53,919
- Population: 5,022
--- 94.7% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#24. Smith County
- Median Income: $48,051
- Population: 3,588
--- 95.7% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#23. Gray County
- Median Income: $70,321
- Population: 5,720
--- 94.8% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#22. McPherson County
- Median Income: $63,816
- Population: 30,059
--- 94.8% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#21. Rush County
- Median Income: $50,714
- Population: 2,883
--- 91.8% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#20. Rooks County
- Median Income: $55,000
- Population: 4,975
--- 95% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#19. Trego County
- Median Income: $78,529
- Population: 2,825
--- 96.7% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#18. Miami County
- Median Income: $79,211
- Population: 33,968
--- 93.4% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#17. Johnson County
- Median Income: $96,059
- Population: 605,154
--- 83.4% white
--- 4.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 5.3% Asian
#16. Mitchell County
- Median Income: $49,250
- Population: 5,884
--- 95.7% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#15. Sheridan County
- Median Income: $68,952
- Population: 2,459
--- 94.3% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#14. Nemaha County
- Median Income: $65,177
- Population: 10,197
--- 96.1% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#13. Washington County
- Median Income: $53,491
- Population: 5,531
--- 96% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#12. Douglas County
- Median Income: $62,594
- Population: 118,690
--- 80.5% white
--- 4.2% Black
--- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 5.1% Asian
#11. Jefferson County
- Median Income: $72,270
- Population: 18,391
--- 94.7% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#10. Clark County
- Median Income: $55,556
- Population: 1,994
--- 89.5% white
--- 0% Black
--- 2.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#9. Wabaunsee County
- Median Income: $66,589
- Population: 6,881
--- 94.4% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#8. Pottawatomie County
- Median Income: $76,089
- Population: 25,082
--- 92.8% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#7. Ellis County
- Median Income: $54,858
- Population: 28,893
--- 91.3% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#6. Riley County
- Median Income: $53,296
- Population: 72,602
--- 81% white
--- 6.2% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 4.7% Asian
#5. Comanche County
- Median Income: $49,333
- Population: 1,809
--- 97.7% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#4. Gove County
- Median Income: $53,226
- Population: 2,774
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#3. Kiowa County
- Median Income: $61,406
- Population: 2,457
--- 91.7% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#2. Wallace County
- Median Income: $56,538
- Population: 1,529
--- 94.5% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#1. Hodgeman County
- Median Income: $62,902
- Population: 1,851
--- 97.5% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.