Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Kentucky
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Kentucky
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Kentucky children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Garrard County
- Median Income: $58,137
- Population: 17,018
--- 93.5% white
--- 2.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#49. Rowan County
- Median Income: $45,681
- Population: 24,654
--- 95.6% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#48. Muhlenberg County
- Median Income: $46,124
- Population: 31,011
--- 92.3% white
--- 4.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#47. Logan County
- Median Income: $53,133
- Population: 27,319
--- 90% white
--- 6.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#46. Owen County
- Median Income: $52,450
- Population: 11,160
--- 95% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#45. Trigg County
- Median Income: $53,693
- Population: 14,067
--- 89.2% white
--- 7.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#44. Marion County
- Median Income: $48,791
- Population: 19,556
--- 89.3% white
--- 6.9% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#43. Nicholas County
- Median Income: $44,306
- Population: 7,517
--- 95.9% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#42. Boyle County
- Median Income: $54,234
- Population: 30,469
--- 85.9% white
--- 7.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#41. Graves County
- Median Income: $48,187
- Population: 36,796
--- 88.5% white
--- 4.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#40. Grant County
- Median Income: $60,040
- Population: 24,918
--- 93.7% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#39. Franklin County
- Median Income: $59,498
- Population: 51,319
--- 82% white
--- 9.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.8% Asian
#38. Greenup County
- Median Income: $55,431
- Population: 35,996
--- 96% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#37. Daviess County
- Median Income: $57,660
- Population: 102,488
--- 88.4% white
--- 4.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
#36. Shelby County
- Median Income: $73,974
- Population: 47,523
--- 83.1% white
--- 6.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#35. Mason County
- Median Income: $48,106
- Population: 17,103
--- 88.4% white
--- 6.2% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#34. McCracken County
- Median Income: $53,366
- Population: 67,394
--- 84% white
--- 10.4% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#33. Madison County
- Median Income: $55,002
- Population: 92,194
--- 90.6% white
--- 4.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#32. Crittenden County
- Median Income: $45,000
- Population: 8,997
--- 95.9% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#31. McLean County
- Median Income: $57,027
- Population: 9,182
--- 96.7% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#30. Jessamine County
- Median Income: $65,196
- Population: 53,016
--- 89.7% white
--- 4.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#29. Grayson County
- Median Income: $40,839
- Population: 26,351
--- 96.2% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#28. Hardin County
- Median Income: $59,863
- Population: 110,134
--- 78.1% white
--- 11.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.9% Asian
#27. Fleming County
- Median Income: $48,315
- Population: 14,996
--- 95.5% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#26. Livingston County
- Median Income: $51,081
- Population: 8,989
--- 96.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#25. Edmonson County
- Median Income: $41,533
- Population: 12,165
--- 94.9% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#24. Ballard County
- Median Income: $52,695
- Population: 7,814
--- 92.7% white
--- 3.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#23. Caldwell County
- Median Income: $48,280
- Population: 12,641
--- 91.9% white
--- 6.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#22. Harrison County
- Median Income: $53,862
- Population: 18,690
--- 94.7% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#21. Mercer County
- Median Income: $53,750
- Population: 22,470
--- 92.5% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#20. Pendleton County
- Median Income: $57,619
- Population: 14,625
--- 95% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#19. Robertson County
- Median Income: $53,833
- Population: 2,196
--- 98.8% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#18. Meade County
- Median Income: $63,944
- Population: 29,735
--- 91% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#17. Breckinridge County
- Median Income: $49,919
- Population: 20,345
--- 95.1% white
--- 2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#16. Henry County
- Median Income: $52,301
- Population: 15,691
--- 92% white
--- 2.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#15. Bullitt County
- Median Income: $67,892
- Population: 81,729
--- 94% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#14. LaRue County
- Median Income: $53,555
- Population: 14,768
--- 93.2% white
--- 3.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#13. Boone County
- Median Income: $87,034
- Population: 134,599
--- 88.4% white
--- 3.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
#12. Woodford County
- Median Income: $72,765
- Population: 26,758
--- 90.9% white
--- 4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#11. Carlisle County
- Median Income: $42,386
- Population: 4,821
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#10. Calloway County
- Median Income: $44,534
- Population: 37,291
--- 90.7% white
--- 3.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#9. Lyon County
- Median Income: $55,203
- Population: 8,700
--- 91.7% white
--- 5% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#8. Hancock County
- Median Income: $61,622
- Population: 9,050
--- 95.5% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#7. Bracken County
- Median Income: $63,277
- Population: 8,394
--- 96.3% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#6. Campbell County
- Median Income: $65,580
- Population: 93,023
--- 92.9% white
--- 2.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#5. Anderson County
- Median Income: $59,887
- Population: 23,646
--- 94.3% white
--- 2.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#4. Marshall County
- Median Income: $58,989
- Population: 31,662
--- 96.6% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#3. Nelson County
- Median Income: $64,354
- Population: 46,440
--- 91.6% white
--- 5.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#2. Spencer County
- Median Income: $92,973
- Population: 19,256
--- 95.6% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#1. Oldham County
- Median Income: $109,815
- Population: 67,586
--- 89.5% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.