Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Minnesota
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Minnesota
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Minnesota children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Clay County
- Median Income: $67,984
- Population: 64,975
--- 88.5% white
--- 4.8% Black
--- 1.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#49. Wadena County
- Median Income: $50,100
- Population: 14,009
--- 92.8% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#48. Norman County
- Median Income: $58,846
- Population: 6,500
--- 92.2% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#47. Crow Wing County
- Median Income: $60,810
- Population: 65,879
--- 95.1% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#46. Rice County
- Median Income: $71,384
- Population: 66,795
--- 84% white
--- 6.2% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
#45. Sibley County
- Median Income: $67,412
- Population: 14,948
--- 92.1% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#44. Otter Tail County
- Median Income: $63,587
- Population: 59,728
--- 93.2% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#43. Waseca County
- Median Income: $66,502
- Population: 18,972
--- 92.4% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#42. Pennington County
- Median Income: $64,268
- Population: 14,063
--- 92.5% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#41. Jackson County
- Median Income: $64,134
- Population: 10,016
--- 93.4% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#40. Dakota County
- Median Income: $93,892
- Population: 435,863
--- 79.5% white
--- 6.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 5.1% Asian
#39. Redwood County
- Median Income: $59,638
- Population: 15,435
--- 87.1% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 4.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.4% Asian
#38. Scott County
- Median Income: $109,031
- Population: 149,568
--- 81.7% white
--- 4.8% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 6.2% Asian
#37. Yellow Medicine County
- Median Income: $65,014
- Population: 9,616
--- 91.7% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 2.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#36. Mille Lacs County
- Median Income: $61,995
- Population: 26,397
--- 88.9% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 4.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#35. Le Sueur County
- Median Income: $80,425
- Population: 28,567
--- 94% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#34. Murray County
- Median Income: $69,250
- Population: 8,224
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#33. Wilkin County
- Median Income: $57,907
- Population: 6,495
--- 93.9% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#32. Winona County
- Median Income: $61,753
- Population: 49,889
--- 92.2% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.5% Asian
#31. Olmsted County
- Median Income: $84,656
- Population: 160,928
--- 81.7% white
--- 6.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 5.9% Asian
#30. Lake of the Woods County
- Median Income: $55,913
- Population: 3,757
--- 91.9% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#29. Blue Earth County
- Median Income: $65,000
- Population: 68,575
--- 88.8% white
--- 4.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
#28. Cook County
- Median Income: $65,045
- Population: 5,574
--- 85.5% white
--- 0% Black
--- 7.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#27. Red Lake County
- Median Income: $62,417
- Population: 3,921
--- 93.7% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#26. Meeker County
- Median Income: $67,099
- Population: 23,268
--- 95.6% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#25. Sherburne County
- Median Income: $92,374
- Population: 96,295
--- 89.9% white
--- 2.9% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#24. Lake County
- Median Income: $66,828
- Population: 10,835
--- 96.5% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#23. Rock County
- Median Income: $68,638
- Population: 9,718
--- 95.4% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#22. Brown County
- Median Income: $62,999
- Population: 25,894
--- 94.9% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#21. Goodhue County
- Median Income: $71,414
- Population: 47,503
--- 92% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#20. Dodge County
- Median Income: $84,568
- Population: 20,798
--- 92.4% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#19. Grant County
- Median Income: $60,781
- Population: 6,045
--- 95.4% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#18. Washington County
- Median Income: $102,258
- Population: 264,818
--- 82.9% white
--- 4.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 6.6% Asian
#17. Nicollet County
- Median Income: $74,317
- Population: 34,295
--- 89.4% white
--- 2.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#16. McLeod County
- Median Income: $67,067
- Population: 36,662
--- 92.9% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#15. Marshall County
- Median Income: $64,239
- Population: 9,082
--- 94.7% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#14. Benton County
- Median Income: $65,529
- Population: 41,087
--- 89% white
--- 4.7% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#13. Big Stone County
- Median Income: $58,095
- Population: 5,155
--- 96.8% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#12. Isanti County
- Median Income: $78,687
- Population: 40,604
--- 94.5% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#11. Douglas County
- Median Income: $69,069
- Population: 38,742
--- 96.5% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#10. Wabasha County
- Median Income: $70,603
- Population: 21,425
--- 95.7% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#9. Pope County
- Median Income: $67,040
- Population: 11,216
--- 95.3% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#8. Houston County
- Median Income: $62,397
- Population: 18,806
--- 94.9% white
--- 1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#7. Fillmore County
- Median Income: $67,195
- Population: 21,179
--- 96.2% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#6. Lac qui Parle County
- Median Income: $60,718
- Population: 6,753
--- 95.2% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#5. Lincoln County
- Median Income: $58,621
- Population: 5,655
--- 96.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#4. Chisago County
- Median Income: $90,870
- Population: 56,328
--- 93.7% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#3. Kittson County
- Median Income: $60,676
- Population: 4,213
--- 95.3% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#2. Carver County
- Median Income: $107,890
- Population: 105,694
--- 89.7% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.1% Asian
#1. Wright County
- Median Income: $94,276
- Population: 139,890
--- 92.4% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.