Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Mississippi
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Mississippi
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Mississippi children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Grenada County
- Median Income: $40,808
- Population: 21,621
--- 53% white
--- 44.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#49. Hinds County
- Median Income: $46,179
- Population: 230,772
--- 24.3% white
--- 73% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#48. Amite County
- Median Income: $31,367
- Population: 12,718
--- 57.5% white
--- 40.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#47. Jasper County
- Median Income: $39,992
- Population: 16,406
--- 44.3% white
--- 54.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#46. Montgomery County
- Median Income: $35,903
- Population: 9,948
--- 52.1% white
--- 43.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#45. Lauderdale County
- Median Income: $43,301
- Population: 73,756
--- 53.1% white
--- 43.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#44. Covington County
- Median Income: $40,233
- Population: 18,491
--- 61.7% white
--- 36.1% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#43. Jones County
- Median Income: $43,659
- Population: 67,374
--- 67.7% white
--- 29.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#42. Yalobusha County
- Median Income: $44,348
- Population: 12,586
--- 59.8% white
--- 37.6% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#41. Newton County
- Median Income: $44,530
- Population: 21,385
--- 59.7% white
--- 31.1% Black
--- 4.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#40. Marion County
- Median Income: $34,286
- Population: 24,609
--- 64.3% white
--- 32.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#39. Franklin County
- Median Income: $40,479
- Population: 7,705
--- 62.4% white
--- 35.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#38. Warren County
- Median Income: $50,686
- Population: 45,141
--- 47.4% white
--- 48.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#37. Lowndes County
- Median Income: $49,660
- Population: 58,904
--- 51.8% white
--- 44.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#36. Carroll County
- Median Income: $46,147
- Population: 10,053
--- 64.4% white
--- 35.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#35. Lincoln County
- Median Income: $43,926
- Population: 34,910
--- 67.7% white
--- 30.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#34. Wayne County
- Median Income: $34,766
- Population: 19,824
--- 57.2% white
--- 38.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#33. Lee County
- Median Income: $60,708
- Population: 83,388
--- 65.2% white
--- 29.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#32. Alcorn County
- Median Income: $44,068
- Population: 34,964
--- 82.6% white
--- 10.6% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#31. Monroe County
- Median Income: $47,353
- Population: 34,448
--- 67.9% white
--- 30.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#30. Lawrence County
- Median Income: $39,443
- Population: 12,055
--- 64.5% white
--- 32.6% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#29. Jackson County
- Median Income: $55,107
- Population: 142,993
--- 69.9% white
--- 20.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.4% Asian
#28. Madison County
- Median Income: $74,688
- Population: 108,248
--- 56.7% white
--- 37.8% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.7% Asian
#27. Forrest County
- Median Income: $45,780
- Population: 77,743
--- 58.6% white
--- 36.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#26. Choctaw County
- Median Income: $37,859
- Population: 8,264
--- 68% white
--- 29.9% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#25. Harrison County
- Median Income: $51,590
- Population: 207,382
--- 65.7% white
--- 25.2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.6% Asian
#24. DeSoto County
- Median Income: $73,460
- Population: 183,220
--- 63.1% white
--- 29.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#23. Benton County
- Median Income: $39,311
- Population: 7,687
--- 60.8% white
--- 32.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#22. Simpson County
- Median Income: $43,842
- Population: 26,064
--- 61.3% white
--- 36.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#21. Clarke County
- Median Income: $40,838
- Population: 15,678
--- 63.9% white
--- 34.7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#20. Pontotoc County
- Median Income: $52,150
- Population: 31,136
--- 75.9% white
--- 15.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#19. Tippah County
- Median Income: $41,506
- Population: 21,877
--- 76.9% white
--- 15.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#18. Marshall County
- Median Income: $42,968
- Population: 34,031
--- 48.6% white
--- 46.4% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#17. Prentiss County
- Median Income: $46,417
- Population: 25,022
--- 82.1% white
--- 11.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
#16. Smith County
- Median Income: $51,792
- Population: 14,483
--- 74.4% white
--- 23.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#15. Greene County
- Median Income: $49,581
- Population: 13,653
--- 72.6% white
--- 25% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#14. Stone County
- Median Income: $50,807
- Population: 18,356
--- 78.3% white
--- 16% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#13. Hancock County
- Median Income: $58,196
- Population: 45,911
--- 85.8% white
--- 7% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#12. Tate County
- Median Income: $54,839
- Population: 28,123
--- 66.9% white
--- 30% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#11. Oktibbeha County
- Median Income: $41,094
- Population: 51,339
--- 56.4% white
--- 36.4% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.2% Asian
#10. Tishomingo County
- Median Income: $40,394
- Population: 18,945
--- 92.8% white
--- 2% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#9. Union County
- Median Income: $50,543
- Population: 27,775
--- 77.8% white
--- 15.6% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#8. Perry County
- Median Income: $47,368
- Population: 11,611
--- 80% white
--- 13.8% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#7. Pearl River County
- Median Income: $53,855
- Population: 55,972
--- 82.5% white
--- 12.8% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#6. Webster County
- Median Income: $53,363
- Population: 9,938
--- 79% white
--- 19.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#5. Lamar County
- Median Income: $63,925
- Population: 63,610
--- 75.1% white
--- 20.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#4. George County
- Median Income: $47,385
- Population: 24,260
--- 88.9% white
--- 8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#3. Itawamba County
- Median Income: $53,510
- Population: 23,863
--- 90.8% white
--- 7% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#2. Rankin County
- Median Income: $72,326
- Population: 156,052
--- 73.8% white
--- 21.5% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#1. Lafayette County
- Median Income: $54,720
- Population: 55,727
--- 70.6% white
--- 23.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.9% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.