Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in New Mexico
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in New Mexico
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in New Mexico children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#29. McKinley County
- Median Income: $40,262
- Population: 72,946
--- 11.5% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 75.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#28. Rio Arriba County
- Median Income: $46,994
- Population: 40,347
--- 41.4% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 15.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#27. Luna County
- Median Income: $33,914
- Population: 25,282
--- 74.6% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#26. Cibola County
- Median Income: $47,300
- Population: 27,284
--- 44.4% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 42.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#25. San Miguel County
- Median Income: $36,492
- Population: 27,357
--- 58.5% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#24. Socorro County
- Median Income: $38,242
- Population: 16,605
--- 66.8% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 12% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.9% Asian
#23. Valencia County
- Median Income: $53,752
- Population: 75,992
--- 68.7% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 4.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#22. Grant County
- Median Income: $39,429
- Population: 28,178
--- 80.2% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 1.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#21. Chaves County
- Median Income: $47,620
- Population: 65,014
--- 74.5% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#20. Quay County
- Median Income: $33,067
- Population: 8,675
--- 75.3% white
--- 2.5% Black
--- 2.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
#19. Sierra County
- Median Income: $35,939
- Population: 11,512
--- 82% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 3.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#18. Guadalupe County
- Median Income: $35,409
- Population: 4,465
--- 61% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 8.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#17. San Juan County
- Median Income: $47,485
- Population: 122,912
--- 47% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 39.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#16. Doña Ana County
- Median Income: $47,151
- Population: 218,157
--- 67.6% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#15. Santa Fe County
- Median Income: $64,423
- Population: 153,632
--- 74.1% white
--- 1% Black
--- 3.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#14. Hidalgo County
- Median Income: $46,097
- Population: 4,214
--- 77.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#13. Colfax County
- Median Income: $39,483
- Population: 12,406
--- 79.3% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#12. Torrance County
- Median Income: $44,819
- Population: 15,150
--- 74.2% white
--- 2.5% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#11. Bernalillo County
- Median Income: $56,920
- Population: 674,919
--- 65.6% white
--- 2.9% Black
--- 4.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.7% Asian
#10. Curry County
- Median Income: $51,199
- Population: 48,716
--- 62.6% white
--- 5.3% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#9. Lincoln County
- Median Income: $47,247
- Population: 20,084
--- 83.4% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#8. Roosevelt County
- Median Income: $47,897
- Population: 19,223
--- 70% white
--- 2.3% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#7. Lea County
- Median Income: $62,319
- Population: 72,743
--- 71.5% white
--- 4.2% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#6. Taos County
- Median Income: $49,481
- Population: 34,322
--- 72.1% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 6.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#5. Union County
- Median Income: $37,443
- Population: 4,122
--- 76.9% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 4.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#4. Otero County
- Median Income: $46,949
- Population: 67,298
--- 69.6% white
--- 3.4% Black
--- 6.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#3. Eddy County
- Median Income: $67,759
- Population: 61,096
--- 78.2% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#2. Sandoval County
- Median Income: $68,947
- Population: 147,327
--- 65.3% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 12.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#1. Los Alamos County
- Median Income: $123,677
- Population: 19,169
--- 81.3% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 5.4% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.