Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in North Dakota
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in North Dakota
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in North Dakota children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#48. Sioux County
- Median Income: $39,755
- Population: 3,993
--- 11.2% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 85.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#47. Benson County
- Median Income: $54,375
- Population: 6,090
--- 38.2% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 56.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#46. Rolette County
- Median Income: $49,434
- Population: 12,508
--- 16.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 79.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#45. Mountrail County
- Median Income: $76,520
- Population: 9,717
--- 60% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 31.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#44. McKenzie County
- Median Income: $78,442
- Population: 13,762
--- 80.2% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 10.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#43. Ramsey County
- Median Income: $55,534
- Population: 11,638
--- 82% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 11% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#42. Eddy County
- Median Income: $44,958
- Population: 2,378
--- 90.5% white
--- 0% Black
--- 3.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#41. Williams County
- Median Income: $80,142
- Population: 38,460
--- 79.9% white
--- 4.8% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#40. Morton County
- Median Income: $75,177
- Population: 32,916
--- 89.6% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 3.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#39. Dunn County
- Median Income: $84,459
- Population: 4,054
--- 81.1% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 12.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#38. Walsh County
- Median Income: $59,368
- Population: 10,631
--- 91.2% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#37. Burleigh County
- Median Income: $76,043
- Population: 97,895
--- 87.7% white
--- 2.3% Black
--- 4.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#36. Ward County
- Median Income: $72,227
- Population: 69,686
--- 84.2% white
--- 4.2% Black
--- 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
#35. Stark County
- Median Income: $70,364
- Population: 32,710
--- 88.7% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#34. Stutsman County
- Median Income: $54,652
- Population: 21,678
--- 93.1% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 1.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#33. Cass County
- Median Income: $68,718
- Population: 182,992
--- 85.1% white
--- 6.1% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.3% Asian
#32. Oliver County
- Median Income: $64,148
- Population: 1,850
--- 91.8% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#31. Richland County
- Median Income: $62,481
- Population: 16,546
--- 90.8% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 2.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#30. Grand Forks County
- Median Income: $57,213
- Population: 73,101
--- 84.4% white
--- 4.1% Black
--- 2.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.9% Asian
#29. Towner County
- Median Income: $51,912
- Population: 2,190
--- 88.3% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 8.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#28. Bottineau County
- Median Income: $68,095
- Population: 6,442
--- 91.3% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 4.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#27. Grant County
- Median Income: $57,200
- Population: 2,351
--- 94.8% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#26. Pembina County
- Median Income: $61,795
- Population: 6,912
--- 93.2% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#25. Emmons County
- Median Income: $56,713
- Population: 3,316
--- 97.5% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#24. Renville County
- Median Income: $71,218
- Population: 2,328
--- 98.3% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#23. Bowman County
- Median Income: $76,447
- Population: 3,024
--- 94.4% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#22. Nelson County
- Median Income: $56,724
- Population: 3,035
--- 93.4% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#21. Sargent County
- Median Income: $67,467
- Population: 3,839
--- 92.9% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#20. Barnes County
- Median Income: $64,016
- Population: 10,869
--- 91.1% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
#19. Divide County
- Median Income: $83,438
- Population: 2,196
--- 90.7% white
--- 3.3% Black
--- 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#18. McLean County
- Median Income: $72,324
- Population: 9,788
--- 88% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 7.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#17. Adams County
- Median Income: $52,896
- Population: 2,237
--- 93.9% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian
#15. Traill County
- Median Income: $73,113
- Population: 8,008
--- 93% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#15. Mercer County
- Median Income: $78,547
- Population: 8,405
--- 92.1% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#14. Hettinger County
- Median Income: $62,865
- Population: 2,502
--- 92.6% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 2.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#13. Wells County
- Median Income: $58,932
- Population: 4,031
--- 97.9% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#12. McIntosh County
- Median Income: $58,056
- Population: 2,568
--- 95.4% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#11. Griggs County
- Median Income: $64,196
- Population: 2,242
--- 96.6% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#10. Kidder County
- Median Income: $52,419
- Population: 2,397
--- 93.7% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 2.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#9. McHenry County
- Median Income: $71,612
- Population: 5,420
--- 96.4% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#8. Pierce County
- Median Income: $59,803
- Population: 4,038
--- 92.4% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 4.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
#7. Foster County
- Median Income: $71,250
- Population: 3,396
--- 95.4% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#6. Cavalier County
- Median Income: $60,284
- Population: 3,725
--- 93.6% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#5. Dickey County
- Median Income: $58,267
- Population: 5,013
--- 95.3% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#4. Golden Valley County
- Median Income: $83,295
- Population: 1,812
--- 91.4% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 2.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#3. Ransom County
- Median Income: $67,480
- Population: 5,679
--- 93.7% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#2. Burke County
- Median Income: $97,802
- Population: 2,177
--- 93% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.7% Asian
#1. LaMoure County
- Median Income: $63,594
- Population: 4,173
--- 95.7% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.