Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Oklahoma
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Oklahoma
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Oklahoma children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
#50. Kiowa County
- Median Income: $36,985
- Population: 8,518
--- 79.5% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 4.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#49. Jackson County
- Median Income: $55,551
- Population: 24,960
--- 71.9% white
--- 7% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.4% Asian
#48. Bryan County
- Median Income: $49,225
- Population: 45,809
--- 72.1% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 13.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#47. Mayes County
- Median Income: $52,956
- Population: 39,303
--- 64.5% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 20.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#46. Pittsburg County
- Median Income: $49,669
- Population: 43,836
--- 71.2% white
--- 2.5% Black
--- 5.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#45. Love County
- Median Income: $55,568
- Population: 10,105
--- 78.9% white
--- 2.3% Black
--- 4.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#44. Craig County
- Median Income: $45,094
- Population: 14,172
--- 63.2% white
--- 3.4% Black
--- 21.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#43. Pottawatomie County
- Median Income: $54,896
- Population: 72,331
--- 73.8% white
--- 3.1% Black
--- 14.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
#42. Comanche County
- Median Income: $54,483
- Population: 121,502
--- 60.2% white
--- 15.7% Black
--- 5.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.7% Asian
#41. Johnston County
- Median Income: $46,754
- Population: 10,446
--- 69.2% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 8.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#40. Blaine County
- Median Income: $52,538
- Population: 8,799
--- 79.4% white
--- 4.5% Black
--- 6.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#39. Creek County
- Median Income: $56,384
- Population: 71,879
--- 77.1% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 11.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#38. Coal County
- Median Income: $43,697
- Population: 5,294
--- 67.3% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 8.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#37. Greer County
- Median Income: $49,203
- Population: 5,548
--- 80.2% white
--- 5% Black
--- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#36. Pontotoc County
- Median Income: $55,862
- Population: 38,102
--- 66% white
--- 2.6% Black
--- 16.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#35. Jefferson County
- Median Income: $43,438
- Population: 5,491
--- 82% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 4.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#34. Beckham County
- Median Income: $50,365
- Population: 22,349
--- 82% white
--- 5.2% Black
--- 2.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#33. Garvin County
- Median Income: $50,441
- Population: 25,949
--- 80.8% white
--- 2% Black
--- 4.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#32. Pawnee County
- Median Income: $53,084
- Population: 15,687
--- 76.6% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 10.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#31. Woodward County
- Median Income: $55,700
- Population: 20,591
--- 86.3% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 2.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#30. Washita County
- Median Income: $55,750
- Population: 11,014
--- 86.2% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#29. Nowata County
- Median Income: $46,786
- Population: 9,484
--- 66% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 15.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#28. Cotton County
- Median Income: $54,787
- Population: 5,603
--- 79.3% white
--- 2.1% Black
--- 9.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#27. Custer County
- Median Income: $55,074
- Population: 28,564
--- 75.8% white
--- 3.4% Black
--- 4.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
#26. Stephens County
- Median Income: $53,470
- Population: 42,983
--- 81.1% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 4.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#25. Osage County
- Median Income: $54,036
- Population: 46,140
--- 63.8% white
--- 10.8% Black
--- 11.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
#24. Murray County
- Median Income: $54,160
- Population: 13,874
--- 73.6% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 12.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#23. Washington County
- Median Income: $55,216
- Population: 52,382
--- 74.2% white
--- 2.6% Black
--- 10.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.1% Asian
#22. Latimer County
- Median Income: $39,939
- Population: 9,555
--- 64.6% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 22.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
#21. Grady County
- Median Income: $68,925
- Population: 54,739
--- 83.8% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 4.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#20. Noble County
- Median Income: $62,910
- Population: 11,020
--- 81% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 7.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#19. Lincoln County
- Median Income: $54,578
- Population: 33,650
--- 83.4% white
--- 2% Black
--- 7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#18. Beaver County
- Median Income: $60,152
- Population: 5,100
--- 76.4% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
#17. Rogers County
- Median Income: $69,322
- Population: 94,637
--- 72.8% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 12.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.6% Asian
#16. Kingfisher County
- Median Income: $61,657
- Population: 15,272
--- 85.2% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.9% Asian
#15. Cleveland County
- Median Income: $67,068
- Population: 292,110
--- 74.5% white
--- 5% Black
--- 4.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 4.4% Asian
#14. Harper County
- Median Income: $51,481
- Population: 3,358
--- 83.7% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#13. Wagoner County
- Median Income: $68,906
- Population: 80,509
--- 72.2% white
--- 3.5% Black
--- 9.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.8% Asian
#12. Logan County
- Median Income: $74,744
- Population: 49,005
--- 81.3% white
--- 7.4% Black
--- 3.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
#11. Cimarron County
- Median Income: $50,350
- Population: 2,271
--- 90.1% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#10. Canadian County
- Median Income: $76,973
- Population: 151,174
--- 77.9% white
--- 3.3% Black
--- 3.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.1% Asian
#9. Ellis County
- Median Income: $52,250
- Population: 3,813
--- 90.3% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.8% Asian
#8. Roger Mills County
- Median Income: $58,385
- Population: 3,477
--- 86% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 6.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
#7. Major County
- Median Income: $60,025
- Population: 7,753
--- 86.5% white
--- 0% Black
--- 2.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
#6. McClain County
- Median Income: $73,914
- Population: 41,258
--- 82.7% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 5.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#5. Payne County
- Median Income: $43,686
- Population: 81,817
--- 78.9% white
--- 3.7% Black
--- 4.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 4.2% Asian
#4. Alfalfa County
- Median Income: $66,552
- Population: 5,744
--- 84% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
#3. Grant County
- Median Income: $54,150
- Population: 4,166
--- 88.6% white
--- 2% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#2. Dewey County
- Median Income: $53,672
- Population: 4,548
--- 85% white
--- 0% Black
--- 5.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
#1. Woods County
- Median Income: $55,933
- Population: 8,731
--- 88.4% white
--- 3.4% Black
--- 3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.