Stacker Studio

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in South Dakota

Written by:
January 23, 2024
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in South Dakota

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in South Dakota children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

1 / 50
Canva

#50. Beadle County

- Economic connectedness: 0.7
- Median Income: $56,692
- Population: 18,959
--- 76.5% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 7.7% Asian
2 / 50
Canva

#49. Pennington County

- Economic connectedness: 0.84
- Median Income: $62,546
- Population: 108,707
--- 80.6% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 8.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
3 / 50
Canva

#48. Walworth County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85
- Median Income: $51,746
- Population: 5,355
--- 79.5% white
--- 3.7% Black
--- 12% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
4 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#47. Tripp County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86
- Median Income: $52,274
- Population: 5,615
--- 79.6% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 16% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
5 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#46. Marshall County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9
- Median Income: $69,236
- Population: 4,373
--- 84% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 7.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
6 / 50
Canva

#45. Fall River County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9
- Median Income: $51,007
- Population: 6,979
--- 84.7% white
--- 0% Black
--- 8.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
7 / 50
Steven Frame // Shutterstock

#44. Minnehaha County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9
- Median Income: $66,502
- Population: 194,884
--- 83.2% white
--- 6.1% Black
--- 2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
8 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#43. Moody County

- Economic connectedness: 0.9
- Median Income: $66,000
- Population: 6,335
--- 77.3% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 11.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2% Asian
9 / 50
Canva

#42. Butte County

- Economic connectedness: 0.93
- Median Income: $48,941
- Population: 10,167
--- 91% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
10 / 50
Canva

#41. Yankton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.94
- Median Income: $67,052
- Population: 23,213
--- 89.5% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 3.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
11 / 50
Canva

#40. Brule County

- Economic connectedness: 0.94
- Median Income: $60,857
- Population: 5,247
--- 83.7% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 13.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
12 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#39. Hamlin County

- Economic connectedness: 0.94
- Median Income: $71,923
- Population: 6,127
--- 96.2% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
13 / 50
Canva

#38. Hughes County

- Economic connectedness: 0.95
- Median Income: $77,725
- Population: 17,829
--- 81.7% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 11.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
14 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#37. Gregory County

- Economic connectedness: 0.95
- Median Income: $44,654
- Population: 4,004
--- 88.1% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 7.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
15 / 50
J K Laws // Shutterstock

#36. Davison County

- Economic connectedness: 0.96
- Median Income: $50,900
- Population: 19,944
--- 92.1% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
16 / 50
Canva

#35. Grant County

- Economic connectedness: 0.97
- Median Income: $70,483
- Population: 7,550
--- 92.9% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
17 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#34. Brown County

- Economic connectedness: 0.97
- Median Income: $63,805
- Population: 38,471
--- 86.6% white
--- 2.5% Black
--- 3.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.5% Asian
18 / 50
Canva

#33. Stanley County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98
- Median Income: $76,402
- Population: 2,963
--- 91.1% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 3.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
19 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#32. Jerauld County

- Economic connectedness: 1.
- Median Income: $58,375
- Population: 1,811
--- 91.3% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
20 / 50
Canva

#31. Meade County

- Economic connectedness: 1.01
- Median Income: $68,242
- Population: 29,561
--- 89.3% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 2.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
21 / 50
Canva

#30. Sanborn County

- Economic connectedness: 1.01
- Median Income: $58,409
- Population: 2,371
--- 96% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
22 / 50
melissamn // Shutterstock

#29. Aurora County

- Economic connectedness: 1.02
- Median Income: $64,960
- Population: 2,649
--- 94.3% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
23 / 50
Canva

#28. Custer County

- Economic connectedness: 1.03
- Median Income: $68,736
- Population: 8,360
--- 91.4% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 2.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
24 / 50
Canva

#27. Haakon County

- Economic connectedness: 1.03
- Median Income: $51,016
- Population: 1,868
--- 94.1% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 3.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
25 / 50
Canva

#26. Codington County

- Economic connectedness: 1.04
- Median Income: $61,496
- Population: 28,289
--- 92.9% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 2.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
26 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#25. Hyde County

- Economic connectedness: 1.04
- Median Income: $66,328
- Population: 1,381
--- 92.3% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
27 / 50
Canva

#24. Lawrence County

- Economic connectedness: 1.04
- Median Income: $56,166
- Population: 25,687
--- 92% white
--- 1% Black
--- 2.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
28 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#23. Clark County

- Economic connectedness: 1.04
- Median Income: $54,473
- Population: 3,791
--- 94.4% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
29 / 50
vagabond54 // Shutterstock

#22. Day County

- Economic connectedness: 1.05
- Median Income: $52,775
- Population: 5,487
--- 86.1% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 10.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
30 / 50
Canva

#21. Lake County

- Economic connectedness: 1.07
- Median Income: $67,297
- Population: 11,358
--- 93.8% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 2.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
31 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#20. Edmunds County

- Economic connectedness: 1.07
- Median Income: $69,732
- Population: 4,005
--- 96.3% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
32 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#19. Spink County

- Economic connectedness: 1.08
- Median Income: $63,802
- Population: 6,408
--- 94.6% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
33 / 50
Bennekom // Shutterstock

#18. Bon Homme County

- Economic connectedness: 1.1
- Median Income: $53,575
- Population: 7,020
--- 86.8% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 6.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
34 / 50
Canva

#17. Clay County

- Economic connectedness: 1.12
- Median Income: $56,077
- Population: 14,816
--- 86.5% white
--- 1.8% Black
--- 3.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.9% Asian
35 / 50
Canva

#16. Brookings County

- Economic connectedness: 1.12
- Median Income: $59,178
- Population: 34,315
--- 90.6% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.1% Asian
36 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#15. Douglas County

- Economic connectedness: 1.12
- Median Income: $66,750
- Population: 2,838
--- 94.2% white
--- 1.5% Black
--- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
37 / 50
Danita Delimont // Shutterstock

#14. Hutchinson County

- Economic connectedness: 1.12
- Median Income: $62,448
- Population: 7,412
--- 92.8% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
38 / 50
Patrick Ziegler // Shutterstock

#13. McCook County

- Economic connectedness: 1.13
- Median Income: $72,063
- Population: 5,676
--- 95.6% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
39 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#12. Turner County

- Economic connectedness: 1.14
- Median Income: $66,199
- Population: 8,621
--- 95.8% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
40 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#11. Perkins County

- Economic connectedness: 1.15
- Median Income: $59,432
- Population: 2,977
--- 94.4% white
--- 0% Black
--- 2.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
41 / 50
Canva

#10. Lincoln County

- Economic connectedness: 1.16
- Median Income: $87,560
- Population: 63,233
--- 92.6% white
--- 2.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
42 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#9. McPherson County

- Economic connectedness: 1.16
- Median Income: $54,324
- Population: 2,245
--- 96.3% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
43 / 50
Canva

#8. Kingsbury County

- Economic connectedness: 1.16
- Median Income: $62,634
- Population: 5,131
--- 95.4% white
--- 0% Black
--- 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
44 / 50
Sabrina Janelle Gordon // Shutterstock

#7. Union County

- Economic connectedness: 1.18
- Median Income: $80,238
- Population: 16,424
--- 92% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
45 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#6. Deuel County

- Economic connectedness: 1.18
- Median Income: $70,808
- Population: 4,283
--- 97.8% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
46 / 50
Canva

#5. Miner County

- Economic connectedness: 1.19
- Median Income: $56,351
- Population: 2,293
--- 94.3% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
47 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#4. Hand County

- Economic connectedness: 1.21
- Median Income: $61,121
- Population: 3,061
--- 94.4% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
48 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#3. Hanson County

- Economic connectedness: 1.21
- Median Income: $75,132
- Population: 3,429
--- 96.6% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
49 / 50
SevenMaps // Shutterstock

#2. Faulk County

- Economic connectedness: 1.22
- Median Income: $53,056
- Population: 2,157
--- 97.2% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
50 / 50
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock

#1. Potter County

- Economic connectedness: 1.24
- Median Income: $59,408
- Population: 2,613
--- 91.1% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 2.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 2.3% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

Trending Now