Best- and worst-run cities in California

·Stacker

Marek Masik // Shutterstock
Marek Masik // Shutterstock

Historically high inflation has put a strain on municipal budgets, with the rising costs of labor, goods and services, and materials. In general, local governments made it through the COVID-19 pandemic relatively well, with the help of billions of dollars in federal aid.

The economic aftermath, however, continues. And some cities continue to struggle more than others, particularly those that are poorly managed.

Stacker examined WalletHub's 149 Best- and Worst-Run Cities in America to find the most efficient cities in California. Cities are ranked by their overall operating efficiency, which is determined by the quality of services and total budget per capita. The data was last updated in June 2023.

Factors used to determine the overall quality of city services rank and score comprise weighted average scores in six key categories, including financial stability, education, health, safety, economy, and infrastructure and pollution. Scores for each of the six categories were evaluated based on 36 relevant metrics such as average life expectancy, violent crime rate, quality of roads, and Moody's city credit rating.

Read on to see the best- and worst-run cities in California.

You may also like: Baldest states: See how California ranks for hair-loss medication prescriptions

#16. San Francisco

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

1 / 16

#16. San Francisco

- WalletHub rank: #149 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 12
- Financial stability rank: 49
- Education rank: 12
- Health rank: 2
- Safety rank: 65
- Economy rank: 92
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 16

#15. Oakland

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

2 / 16

#15. Oakland

- WalletHub rank: #143 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 76
- Financial stability rank: 65
- Education rank: 60
- Health rank: 6
- Safety rank: 126
- Economy rank: 131
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 97

#14. Riverside

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

3 / 16

#14. Riverside

- WalletHub rank: #133 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 87
- Financial stability rank: 126
- Education rank: 57
- Health rank: 47
- Safety rank: 55
- Economy rank: 16
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 145

#13. Long Beach

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

4 / 16

#13. Long Beach

- WalletHub rank: #129 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 75
- Financial stability rank: 130
- Education rank: 32
- Health rank: 16
- Safety rank: 48
- Economy rank: 122
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 120

#12. Los Angeles

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

5 / 16

#12. Los Angeles

- WalletHub rank: #128 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 59
- Financial stability rank: 96
- Education rank: 85
- Health rank: 21
- Safety rank: 53
- Economy rank: 119
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 87

You may also like: Most popular boy names in the 60s in California

#11. Stockton

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

6 / 16

#11. Stockton

- WalletHub rank: #121 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 139
- Financial stability rank: 140
- Education rank: 120
- Health rank: 88
- Safety rank: 115
- Economy rank: 107
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 147

#10. Sacramento

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

7 / 16

#10. Sacramento

- WalletHub rank: #120 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 92
- Financial stability rank: 117
- Education rank: 76
- Health rank: 55
- Safety rank: 79
- Economy rank: 97
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 103

#9. Fresno

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

8 / 16

#9. Fresno

- WalletHub rank: #118 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 113
- Financial stability rank: 113
- Education rank: 70
- Health rank: 81
- Safety rank: 86
- Economy rank: 99
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 137

#8. Modesto

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

9 / 16

#8. Modesto

- WalletHub rank: #116 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 103
- Financial stability rank: 121
- Education rank: 107
- Health rank: 95
- Safety rank: 63
- Economy rank: 74
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 100

#6. San Jose

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

11 / 16

#6. San Jose

- WalletHub rank: #104 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 17
- Financial stability rank: 57
- Education rank: 23
- Health rank: 1
- Safety rank: 40
- Economy rank: 61
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 121

#5. Anaheim

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

12 / 16

#5. Anaheim

- WalletHub rank: #99 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 68
- Financial stability rank: 139
- Education rank: 44
- Health rank: 8
- Safety rank: 38
- Economy rank: 57
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 124

#4. Fremont

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

13 / 16

#4. Fremont

- WalletHub rank: #78 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 2
- Financial stability rank: 122
- Education rank: 1
- Health rank: 9
- Safety rank: 27
- Economy rank: 19
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 104

#3. Santa Ana

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

14 / 16

#3. Santa Ana

- WalletHub rank: #71 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 48
- Financial stability rank: 88
- Education rank: 82
- Health rank: 10
- Safety rank: 39
- Economy rank: 53
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 129

#2. San Diego

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

15 / 16

#2. San Diego

- WalletHub rank: #56 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 7
- Financial stability rank: 86
- Education rank: 8
- Health rank: 7
- Safety rank: 25
- Economy rank: 39
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 41

You may also like: Hottest Januarys in California since 1895

#1. Huntington Beach

Marek Masik // Shutterstock

16 / 16

#1. Huntington Beach

- WalletHub rank: #21 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 1
- Financial stability rank: 62
- Education rank: 2
- Health rank: 11
- Safety rank: 15
- Economy rank: 26
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 66

This story features data reporting and writing by Elena Cox and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 19 states.