Stacker Studio

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in West Virginia

Written by:
January 23, 2024
Canva

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in West Virginia

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they've cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in West Virginia children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

1 / 55
Canva

#55. McDowell County

- Economic connectedness: 0.62
- Median Income: $30,127
- Population: 19,334
--- 89.7% white
--- 8.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
2 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#54. Webster County

- Economic connectedness: 0.64
- Median Income: $37,720
- Population: 8,415
--- 98.3% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
3 / 55
Canva

#53. Lincoln County

- Economic connectedness: 0.68
- Median Income: $46,683
- Population: 20,625
--- 97.6% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
4 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#52. Clay County

- Economic connectedness: 0.69
- Median Income: $37,197
- Population: 8,176
--- 99.4% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
5 / 55
Claire Salvail Photos // Shutterstock

#51. Mercer County

- Economic connectedness: 0.7
- Median Income: $43,293
- Population: 59,892
--- 90.1% white
--- 5.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
6 / 55
Canva

#50. Fayette County

- Economic connectedness: 0.71
- Median Income: $45,988
- Population: 41,056
--- 93% white
--- 5% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
7 / 55
Canva

#49. Randolph County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $47,343
- Population: 28,150
--- 92.2% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
8 / 55
Canva

#48. Mingo County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $35,349
- Population: 23,821
--- 95.9% white
--- 2.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
9 / 55
Canva

#47. Pocahontas County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $37,225
- Population: 8,006
--- 98.9% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
10 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#46. Nicholas County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $42,946
- Population: 24,770
--- 97% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
11 / 55
Canva

#45. Wyoming County

- Economic connectedness: 0.72
- Median Income: $44,630
- Population: 21,581
--- 97.5% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
12 / 55
Joseph Sohm // Shutterstock

#44. Greenbrier County

- Economic connectedness: 0.73
- Median Income: $41,694
- Population: 33,307
--- 92.7% white
--- 1.9% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
13 / 55
Canva

#43. Calhoun County

- Economic connectedness: 0.73
- Median Income: $37,428
- Population: 6,420
--- 98.7% white
--- 0% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
14 / 55
Canva

#42. Boone County

- Economic connectedness: 0.73
- Median Income: $50,598
- Population: 22,059
--- 97.6% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
15 / 55
Canva

#41. Wayne County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $45,591
- Population: 39,337
--- 96.5% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
16 / 55
Steve Heap // Shutterstock

#40. Upshur County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $44,470
- Population: 23,965
--- 94.9% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
17 / 55
Canva

#39. Roane County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $38,608
- Population: 14,129
--- 96.6% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
18 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#38. Braxton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $42,519
- Population: 12,702
--- 90.8% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
19 / 55
The American Explorer // Shutterstock

#37. Monroe County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $47,417
- Population: 12,492
--- 96.9% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
20 / 55
Canva

#36. Summers County

- Economic connectedness: 0.74
- Median Income: $41,077
- Population: 12,125
--- 93.6% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
21 / 55
Rosemarie Mosteller // Shutterstock

#35. Mason County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76
- Median Income: $49,957
- Population: 25,667
--- 96.4% white
--- 0.4% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1% Asian
22 / 55
Canva

#34. Barbour County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76
- Median Income: $42,260
- Population: 15,600
--- 93.1% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
23 / 55
Kenneth Keifer // Shutterstock

#33. Wetzel County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76
- Median Income: $47,611
- Population: 14,629
--- 97.4% white
--- 0.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
24 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#32. Lewis County

- Economic connectedness: 0.76
- Median Income: $45,345
- Population: 16,966
--- 94.5% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
25 / 55
Canva

#31. Wirt County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77
- Median Income: $49,441
- Population: 5,264
--- 96.7% white
--- 1.1% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
26 / 55
Canva

#30. Wood County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77
- Median Income: $50,231
- Population: 84,678
--- 95.7% white
--- 1.2% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
27 / 55
Jay Wiberg // Shutterstock

#29. Logan County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77
- Median Income: $38,493
- Population: 32,786
--- 96.2% white
--- 1.4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.6% Asian
28 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#28. Raleigh County

- Economic connectedness: 0.77
- Median Income: $43,150
- Population: 74,929
--- 87.6% white
--- 7.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
29 / 55
Canva

#27. Tyler County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78
- Median Income: $50,601
- Population: 8,397
--- 97% white
--- 0.5% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
30 / 55
Canva

#26. Kanawha County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78
- Median Income: $50,574
- Population: 181,953
--- 87.7% white
--- 6.8% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.2% Asian
31 / 55
Dee Browning // Shutterstock

#25. Cabell County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78
- Median Income: $43,779
- Population: 94,622
--- 90.2% white
--- 4.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.3% Asian
32 / 55
Nicole Glass Photography // Shutterstock

#24. Hardy County

- Economic connectedness: 0.78
- Median Income: $46,592
- Population: 14,269
--- 91.3% white
--- 4% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
33 / 55
The Old Major // Shutterstock

#23. Gilmer County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79
- Median Income: $45,870
- Population: 7,516
--- 82.1% white
--- 11.7% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
34 / 55
Dennis Ray Dennison II // Shutterstock

#22. Mineral County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79
- Median Income: $57,345
- Population: 27,045
--- 93.9% white
--- 2.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
35 / 55
Canva

#21. Ritchie County

- Economic connectedness: 0.79
- Median Income: $45,184
- Population: 8,676
--- 96.6% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
36 / 55
Canva

#20. Preston County

- Economic connectedness: 0.8
- Median Income: $55,755
- Population: 34,266
--- 92.3% white
--- 4.6% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
37 / 55
Bob Couperthwaite // Shutterstock

#19. Hampshire County

- Economic connectedness: 0.81
- Median Income: $50,890
- Population: 23,214
--- 95.7% white
--- 0.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
38 / 55
Kenneth Keifer // Shutterstock

#18. Doddridge County

- Economic connectedness: 0.81
- Median Income: $58,750
- Population: 7,929
--- 96.8% white
--- 1.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
39 / 55
Jerry Sharp // Shutterstock

#17. Hancock County

- Economic connectedness: 0.81
- Median Income: $52,062
- Population: 29,223
--- 94.2% white
--- 2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
40 / 55
JNix // Shutterstock

#16. Jackson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82
- Median Income: $53,165
- Population: 28,011
--- 97.1% white
--- 0.3% Black
--- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.4% Asian
41 / 55
Canva

#15. Marshall County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82
- Median Income: $52,371
- Population: 30,813
--- 96% white
--- 0.6% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.2% Asian
42 / 55
Malachi Jacobs // Shutterstock

#14. Pendleton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82
- Median Income: $46,506
- Population: 6,249
--- 93.7% white
--- 3.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
43 / 55
Canva

#13. Pleasants County

- Economic connectedness: 0.82
- Median Income: $58,433
- Population: 7,623
--- 97.1% white
--- 0.8% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0% Asian
44 / 55
mzglass96 // Shutterstock

#12. Grant County

- Economic connectedness: 0.83
- Median Income: $47,224
- Population: 11,063
--- 96.3% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
45 / 55
Steve Heap // Shutterstock

#11. Taylor County

- Economic connectedness: 0.83
- Median Income: $52,823
- Population: 16,727
--- 96.4% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
46 / 55
Canva

#10. Harrison County

- Economic connectedness: 0.83
- Median Income: $54,124
- Population: 66,222
--- 94.2% white
--- 1.3% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
47 / 55
Canva

#9. Ohio County

- Economic connectedness: 0.84
- Median Income: $51,516
- Population: 42,443
--- 92% white
--- 3.2% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.7% Asian
48 / 55
Gage Goulding // Shutterstock

#8. Brooke County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85
- Median Income: $51,210
- Population: 22,603
--- 94.7% white
--- 1.7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.5% Asian
49 / 55
Canva

#7. Tucker County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86
- Median Income: $49,808
- Population: 6,822
--- 97.2% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
50 / 55
Canva

#6. Marion County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86
- Median Income: $55,094
- Population: 56,256
--- 93% white
--- 3.1% Black
--- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.3% Asian
51 / 55
Angel Cochran // Shutterstock

#5. Putnam County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91
- Median Income: $68,740
- Population: 57,385
--- 95.1% white
--- 0.9% Black
--- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.9% Asian
52 / 55
Byron Key // Shutterstock

#4. Berkeley County

- Economic connectedness: 0.92
- Median Income: $68,101
- Population: 120,460
--- 84.9% white
--- 7% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.1% Asian
53 / 55
Matt Levi Media // Shutterstock

#3. Morgan County

- Economic connectedness: 0.94
- Median Income: $56,616
- Population: 17,144
--- 94.6% white
--- 0.2% Black
--- 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 0.1% Asian
54 / 55
Canva

#2. Jefferson County

- Economic connectedness: 1.02
- Median Income: $86,711
- Population: 57,542
--- 85% white
--- 5.5% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 1.5% Asian
55 / 55
Canva

#1. Monongalia County

- Economic connectedness: 1.04
- Median Income: $56,466
- Population: 105,695
--- 88.7% white
--- 3.6% Black
--- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
--- 3.5% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

Trending Now